potiuk commented on issue #46464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/46464#issuecomment-2645897524

   > My main concern was that the current approach for reviewing was not very 
clear to me, and missing the reviewers in PR was looking like it gonna stale as 
a lot of PRs here even with reviewers set. Thank you for pointing to the 
contribution workflow doc! I've missed it. I will take a proper read now to 
clear all things.
   > 
   > You are right that I am not used to "no reaction" for 24h+ and I should be 
more patient. I didn't want to make any nuance and will try to implement your 
advice about multiple tasks to work on, thank you! I am just really interested 
in the development of this awesome system.
   > 
   > > I just - lterally an hour ago started a discussion about that on our 
devlist https://lists.apache.org/thread/xq7837nd2j99slb558ls7b6jqntq6y32
   > 
   > Yeah, I am already subscribed to the list and will try to add my 2 cents 
on the improvement of the process
   
   Cool.. BTW. Sometimes even to "think" about the response will take time - 
and you also have to take into account that some people here handle multiple 
100s PRs/Issues a week. 
   
   Patience and opening several streams of work to contribute is key ingredient 
of success in OSS contributions :) 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to