kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #47673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47673

   <!--
    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    distributed with this work for additional information
    regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
    Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    specific language governing permissions and limitations
    under the License.
    -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
   are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
   remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping committers for the review!
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   closes: #ISSUE
   related: #ISSUE
   
   How to write a good git commit message:
   http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   -->
   In OpenLineage, we use the `DefaultExtractor` to extract lineage metadata 
from Operators that implement OL methods. To determine whether a task succeeded 
or failed, we previously relied on `ti.state` 
[here](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/eebdf4e9fbbe9badd1f93dbaf1c9a0d1d2aa357c/providers/openlineage/src/airflow/providers/openlineage/extractors/base.py#L126).
 However, in **Airflow 3**, this approach is no longer viable because we now 
receive a `RuntimeTaskInstance`. I don’t believe we can directly extract the 
state from it, so I adjusted the logic inside OL's listener. Now, depending on 
which listener method is called (`on_task_instance_running`, 
`on_task_instance_success`, `on_task_instance_failed`), we manually propagate 
the current `TaskInstanceState` to the OL's `ExtractorManager`. This change 
allows us to invoke appropriate Extractor method (`extract_on_complete` or 
newly added `extract_on_failure`).
   
   
   I think adding a new method to the extractor base class is the simplest 
approach, ensuring we don’t break anything for users with existing custom 
extractors. The only action required for users with a custom extractor will be 
to implement this new method (`extract_on_failure`), but only when using 
**Airflow 3** and  implementing the `get_openlineage_facets_on_failure` method 
in their operators (otherwise in Airflow 3 we will always call 
`extract_on_complete` as usual, but user will not be able to retrieve the state 
information from `RuntimeTaskInstance`).
   
   This keeps the transition smooth while maintaining backward compatibility.
   
   <!-- Please keep an empty line above the dashes. -->
   ---
   **^ Add meaningful description above**
   Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information.
   In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party 
License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a 
newsfragment file, named `{pr_number}.significant.rst` or 
`{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/newsfragments).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to