potiuk commented on PR #49748: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49748#issuecomment-2832716328
And - just to be very clear about my reservations here - what happens if someone reads the the README tomorrow and says `I used uv to install airflow in production and it does not work` - what do we respond? Do we have a page that we can direct the user to when we explain how to use `uv` ? Are we sure (and checking as we do with `pip` ) that any future version of uv can be used to install airflow? I have completely nothing against `uv` - I was one of the first to proposed it to be used for our development pipelines and CI especially to speed it up. But making it official for producion-ready installation of airflow requires way more than few words of change in README.md for users (not for contributors/developers)- it requires documentation and commitment (and CI tests that verify that installation works - something that we do now for `pip` by running PROD imaage installation with `pip` rather than `uv` now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
