renzepost commented on PR #49752: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49752#issuecomment-2835673970
> Do we also need (maybe in another PR) to update the mark as failed ? To also not early fail teardown tasks? I didn't investigate this thoroughly, but I think mark failed already works as expected. Or do you think the `running_states` there might not cover all the cases? I could create another PR if that's the case, or if I don't have time I could at least create another issue for someone else to pick up. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
