pierrejeambrun commented on issue #53817: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/53817#issuecomment-3197335968
I'm not sure of the expected behavior. Deleting `queuedEvents` will actually remove from `asset_dag_run_queue` table, but leave events records in `AssetEvent`. Maybe the join there should be `inner` here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/core_api/routes/ui/assets.py#L64 This way Assets without `AssetDagRunQueue` shouldn't not be considered when computing the `next_run_assets` ? @vikrantkumar-max should be similar to what you are suggesting in cc: @uranusjr -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
