potiuk commented on PR #53690: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/53690#issuecomment-3218255904
> Thanks and very appreciate your time in review. > > I would like to learn more about the back porting. Is the reason we are doing this because we want to make the changes available in 3.0.x since the main branch is targeting 3.1.0? In this case, I think we need to backport the changes in another PR that updates the serde.py and the function signature from classname to class. Probably it is the main reason for the failed test in backport. Thanks. Yeah. I saw it already and there were conflicts, so I gave up on backporting. It's not worth it if backporting is somewhat complicated and issue is not too serious (and it has certain risks when backporting requires some manual changes). So... no backporting this time -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
