Ankurdeewan commented on PR #56324: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/56324#issuecomment-3366394192
@adamides Yeah, that’s exactly the reasoning I had as well. Different tasks in the same DAG can need different billing contexts, so connection extras alone felt limiting. That’s why I added support both at the connection level (for defaults) and at the Operator level (for overrides), similar to how `project_id` works in other GCP operators. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
