potiuk commented on PR #58138: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/58138#issuecomment-3511024421
Note! Potentially we could have use symbolic links or dynamically copying the LICENCE and NOTICE files. That seems like a LOT of duplication. However, if we want to have the providers to be "truly" standalone and posssibly later to separate them out - we should not use any "common" files from "airflow" in the "build configuration" of the providers. The licence and NOTCE files are VERY unlikely to be changed (except a global search/replace for 2025) - so there is no **real** need for DRY here. In this case WET (Write Everything Twice) seems to be better approach. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
