fritz-astronomer opened a new issue, #59644: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59644
### Description I noticed that this sensor doesn't match the implementation that seems more common in the code base [TimeDeltaSensor](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-standard/stable/sensors/datetime.html#timedeltasensor) [TimeDeltaSensorAsync](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-standard/stable/sensors/datetime.html#timedeltasensorasync) I'd expect `TimeDeltaSensor(deferrable=True)`, to match the pattern most other operators have. Admittedly - I haven't checked to see if the behavior is different to explain an intentional difference, or if this was oversight. ### Use case/motivation _No response_ ### Related issues _No response_ ### Are you willing to submit a PR? - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR! ### Code of Conduct - [x] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
