hanxdatadog commented on issue #46609: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/46609#issuecomment-3702978157
> > Seeing any issue on this topic that the serialized XComOperatorLink is not respecting custom xcom backend. > > I read it three times [@hanxdatadog](https://github.com/hanxdatadog) and I do not understand what you mean. I don't even know if you are asking to change something, endorse the change, or complain about it. > > I suggest - if you have an actionable proposal, open an issue describing what your issue is, possibly pointing to the PR. This PR is now "merged" - so if it causes any issue, open an issue, with reproducible case and link to that PR. Apologies for the confusion. @potiuk. I had a typo, just edited it and add more explanations. I opened a discussion earlier. https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/59914. Basically we are using object storage xcom backend but the operator link expects only DB backend xcom pushes. I was trying something out changes locally. But after reading more code, now I see custom xcom backend is only used at the execution layer. We can follow up more on that discussion. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
