skypher commented on PR #60148:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/60148#issuecomment-3741430299

   > Hey folks, thanks so much for putting this together. We have dropped 
support for old Python versions because now that the bytecode is changing to 
much between Python versions it's not realistic to maintain so many versions 
with the relatively limited engineering cycles we have to devote to this 
project. You can use older Atheris versions for that however. Adding ARM / 
Apple Silicon support is something we have on our roadmap and we are hoping to 
get that up and running this year.
   > 
   > I am curious what problem this PR is trying to solve? Having some CI tests 
sounds useful but why are we moving OSSFuzz tests into the fuzzing framework 
itself? There are a ton of atheris fuzzers in OSSFuzz, why is this one being 
moved specifically?
   
   Hi @AidenRHall, thanks for the comment!
   
   I think there may be a small misunderstanding - we're not moving anything 
out of OSS-Fuzz. Airflow doesn't currently have OSS-Fuzz integration at all.
   
   This PR adds new fuzzing harnesses to the Airflow repository itself, 
following the standard pattern where projects maintain their fuzz targets 
in-tree. These aren't CI tests - they're fuzz targets intended for continuous 
fuzzing via OSS-Fuzz. The eventual goal would be to set up a projects/airflow/ 
configuration in OSS-Fuzz that points to these harnesses.
   
   Does that clarify things?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to