wjddn279 opened a new pull request, #61077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/61077

   closed: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/60868
   
   ## Reason the Issue occurs?
   To summarize the issue: when dag_parsing occurs, there is no increase in the 
Dag version, but when the command `airflow dags reserialize` is executed, an 
increase in the Dag version is observed.
   
   For the following Dag, I confirmed that the hash result from parsing in the 
dag_processor differs from the hash result through the airflow command. Upon 
checking the serialized values, I found that the order of the following two 
fields was different:
   ```
   // dag_processor
   'task_group': {
       "children": {
        "bear": ["bear", "operator"]
       }
   }
   
   // airflow command
   'task_group': {
       "children": {
        "bear": ["operator", "bear"]
       }
   }
   ```
   
   I understood that sorting should be applied to the values, so I needed to 
investigate the cause of this discrepancy.
   
   ## Deep Dive
   
   Initially, I checked whether there were differences in the logic between the 
dag_processor and the airflow command parsing logic, but they were identical. 
Therefore, I logged and compared the serialize_dag before sorting was applied.
   the location of each logging is here ( 
[dag_data](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/3.1.6/airflow-core/src/airflow/models/serialized_dag.py#L342,)
 
[data_](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/3.1.6/airflow-core/src/airflow/models/serialized_dag.py#L344,)
 
[data_json](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/3.1.6/airflow-core/src/airflow/models/serialized_dag.py#L350))
   
   ```
   // serialized dag from airflow dags command 
   'children': {'bear': (<DagAttributeTypes.OP: 'operator'>, 'bear')} 
   // state after sorting dict
   'children': {'bear': (<DagAttributeTypes.OP: 'operator'>, 'bear')} 
   // state after json.loads in here
   'children': {'bear': ['operator', 'bear']}
   
   // serialized dag from dag_processor
   'children': {'bear': ['operator', 'bear']}
   // state after sorting dict
   'children': {'bear': ['bear', 'operator']}
   // state after json.loads in here
   'children': {'bear': ['bear', 'operator']}
   ```
   
   The parsing results were different from the start. In fact, the Dag parsing 
result should match what's generated from the airflow dags command. However, I 
inferred that in the dag_processor, the format was changed during the dumps 
process of the model for inter-subprocess communication.
   
   I confirmed that the result from the airflow dags command was also changed 
to match the dag_processor format after json.loads was applied (enum -> str, 
tuple -> list).
   
   Ironically, the dag_processor, where the format was changed, had sorting 
applied correctly, while the airflow dags command did not, resulting in the 
discrepancy between the two.
   
   ## Solution
   
   The standard solution would be to control the values that change in the 
dag_processor, but this appears to be impossible with the current approach. 
Therefore, I modified the existing task_group serialization method to align 
with the dag_processor's format.
   
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull 
request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: 
http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the 
documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for 
a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we 
sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment 
the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   <!--
   Generated-by: [Tool Name] following [the 
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   -->
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits 
become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst` or `{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to