aeroyorch commented on PR #61809: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/61809#issuecomment-3895482743
> Hmmmmm i'm not sure this is time best approach. Something about it seems "off". > > The main thing i think right now is that this is a big change to how/what task groups are, which by itself isn't necessarily a bad thing but this probably needs a bit of a discussion or highlight on the dev list first I agree with you that the change has enough impact to go through other mechanisms, as you suggested. In fact, in the issue https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21867 there was already some discussion about whether this could be moved forward directly via a PR or not. Given the scope and impact, I’m not entirely sure that simply implementing it and opening a final PR would be sufficient. In any case, my intention with this PR was to implement an initial PoC so we can iterate on something concrete and converge toward a well-defined final design. This is a major functionality gap that emerged after subdags were removed in favor of task groups. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
