potiuk commented on PR #66022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/66022#issuecomment-4416993778

   > Thanks for the thorough review, @potiuk!
   > 
   > Before I dive into the inline comments, I'd like to confirm whether this 
PR can move forward, since your last comment raises a more fundamental concern 
about the design itself.
   > 
   > The scoping question (metastore-only vs. secrets backend) was discussed on 
the dev mailing list: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/m9on5f334rg7ykk33vgpvx9znvoxcvm1
   > 
   > To summarize the outcome:
   > 
   > * @amoghdesai explicitly agreed with the metastore-only scope and 
suggested the lazy-proxy design that the current PR implements.
   > * @jscheffl and @ashb raised concerns (confusion risk with secrets 
backends, AIP-103 overlap), which I addressed in-thread. No blocking objections 
were raised afterward.
   > 
   > That said, if there are additional concerns beyond what was discussed on 
the ML — or if @kaxil sees this differently — I'd rather pause and align before 
iterating on the inline comments.
   
   Thanks for bringing the thread.. No concerns after you quoted it :)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to