MD-Mushfiqur123 commented on PR #67549: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/67549#issuecomment-4553425768
Thank you for the detailed review @pierrejeambrun. I understand now — the COUNT(*) queries were omitted on purpose due to performance concerns on large tables. I will revert this PR to keep the original behavior. Would it be acceptable to add a `state_count_limit` field (the existing cap value) to the response so the frontend can clearly indicate when values are truncated? That way the UI can show "1000+" labels without needing uncapped totals. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
