rapsealk commented on issue #67033: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/67033#issuecomment-4570742374
Closing this issue for now, as I plan to start with a third-party provider implementation first. The proposal and design are still valid, but the scope and Apache Airflow community process (provider acceptance, sponsorship, stewardship, licensing review, etc.) make this better suited as an out-of-tree integration initially. A standalone provider will also allow faster iteration and validation with real-world usage before revisiting an upstream/community-provider path. Thanks everyone who reviewed and discussed the proposal. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
