potiuk opened a new pull request, #152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/pull/152

   **This is a proposal for the PMC to review — please correct,
   reject, or discuss as needed.** Nothing here is a requirement;
   the maintainer is the decision-maker.
   
   This adds an `AGENTS.md` to `apache/airflow-client-python` so
   an automated scan agent can mechanically discover the project's
   security model via the conventional `AGENTS.md → model` chain.
   The client library currently has no in-repo security-discovery
   file, so an agent has no way to find the authoritative Airflow
   security model without out-of-band knowledge.
   
   Context: the ASF Security team is preparing the project for an
   automated agentic security scan we're piloting. Such scans
   refuse to run if the model isn't discoverable by that path
   (refusing upfront beats wasting PMC reviewer cycles on a
   noise-heavy run against an unknown model). Discoverability is
   the one hard gate; everything else is suggestion. The Security
   team has reached out separately on the PMC's private list with
   the program details; this PR is the public-facing repo piece.
   
   The pointer chains the client to the main Apache Airflow
   security model (the same one apache/airflow's AGENTS.md
   points at). The Security team uses
   
[threat-model-producer](https://gist.github.com/potiuk/da14a826283038ddfe38cc9fe6310573)
   as the rubric for what a complete model looks like — but this
   PR is just the *link*; nothing about the model content itself
   changes.
   
   Questions / pushback welcome. Happy to adjust the wording or
   move the section if the project has a house style.
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to