bugraoz93 commented on issue #68402: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/68402#issuecomment-4754544658
> @bugraoz93 thanks for clarifying the marker-only direction. A few commands like `jobs check` have no `airflowctl` equivalent yet. Do we want to implement it? Or this issue only focuses on adding decorator to commands which already have `airflowctl` equivalent implementation? Thank you. If we can implement them that would be great that is actually another side of AIP 94, good questions. I would suggest creating seperate PRs for easy review and clarity on history for core marker and what we are adding as a festure to airflowctl -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
