davidnzhang opened a new pull request, #69171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/69171
<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
# What
The scheduling dependencies endpoint is currently able to return an edge
with a `dag:` endpoint that is never materialised as a node. This appears to be
causing problems for the ELK renderer when creating the dependency graph in the
Assets UI.
This PR adds a loop to backfill any `dag:` nodes that are referenced by an
edge but are missing from the nodes set.
# Why
The scheduling view of the Assets dependency graph fails to render whenever
it contains a Dag referenced by another Dag (e.g. via `TriggerDagRunOperator`
or `ExternalTaskSensor`) and has no scheduling dependencies of its own.
The `get_scheduling_dependencies` function iterates over each Dag's
dependencies to build a list of nodes and edges. A Dag is only materialised as
a `dag:` node if it has at least one dependency of its own, but it is possible
for the same Dag to be an endpoint of an edge if it is referenced by another
Dag. This leaves a dangling edge whose endpoint is missing from the node set.
# Reproduction
Parent Dag
```python
from datetime import datetime
from airflow.providers.standard.operators.empty import EmptyOperator
from airflow.providers.standard.operators.trigger_dagrun import
TriggerDagRunOperator
from airflow.sdk import DAG, Asset
PARENT_ASSET = Asset(name="parent_dag_asset",
uri="s3://some-bucket/parent_dag_asset")
with DAG(dag_id="parent_dag", schedule=None, start_date=datetime(2021, 1,
1), catchup=False):
emit = EmptyOperator(task_id="emit", outlets=[PARENT_ASSET])
trigger = TriggerDagRunOperator(
task_id="trigger_child_dag",
trigger_dag_id="child_dag",
wait_for_completion=False,
)
emit >> trigger
```
Child Dag
```python
from datetime import datetime
from airflow.providers.standard.operators.empty import EmptyOperator
from airflow.sdk import DAG
with DAG(dag_id="child_dag", schedule=None, start_date=datetime(2021, 1, 1),
catchup=False):
EmptyOperator(task_id="some_task")
```
## Before
Scheduling view
<img width="440" height="442" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c3915e55-c21e-4a30-a6c7-f4af685168da"
/><br>
`/ui/dependencies?dependency_type=scheduling` Response
```json
{
"edges": [
{
"source_id": "dag:parent_dag",
"target_id": "asset:1"
},
{
"source_id": "dag:parent_dag",
"target_id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag"
},
{
"source_id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag",
"target_id": "dag:child_dag"
}
],
"nodes": [
{
"id": "dag:parent_dag",
"label": "parent_dag",
"type": "dag",
"team": null
},
{
"id": "asset:1",
"label": "parent_dag_asset",
"type": "asset",
"team": null
},
{
"id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag",
"label": "trigger_child_dag",
"type": "trigger",
"team": null
}
]
}
```
## After
Scheduling view
<img width="1206" height="1212" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18bf8d41-f799-42cf-b130-04e2ed7c7211"
/><br>
`/ui/dependencies?dependency_type=scheduling` Response
```json
{
"edges": [
{
"source_id": "dag:parent_dag",
"target_id": "asset:1"
},
{
"source_id": "dag:parent_dag",
"target_id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag"
},
{
"source_id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag",
"target_id": "dag:child_dag"
}
],
"nodes": [
{
"id": "dag:parent_dag",
"label": "parent_dag",
"type": "dag",
"team": null
},
{
"id": "asset:1",
"label": "parent_dag_asset",
"type": "asset",
"team": null
},
{
"id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag",
"label": "trigger_child_dag",
"type": "trigger",
"team": null
},
{
"id": "dag:child_dag",
"label": "child_dag",
"type": "dag",
"team": null
}
]
}
```
Note node set now correctly includes id: `dag:child_dag`, so edge below is
no longer dangling:
```json
{
"source_id": "trigger:parent_dag:child_dag:trigger_child_dag",
"target_id": "dag:child_dag"
}
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing!
Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull
request.
Write a good git commit message following this guide:
http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the
documentation.
For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a
short
screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for
a few days
(72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we
sometimes miss notifications.
In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
* closes: #ISSUE
* related: #ISSUE
-->
---
##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
<!--
If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR,
please
change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment
the "Generated-by".
-->
- [x] Yes (please specify the tool below)
<!--
Generated-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 following [the
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
-->
---
* Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits
become permanently public when merged.
* For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
is needed.
* When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
* For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment:
`{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you
know the PR number.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]