amoghrajesh opened a new pull request, #70183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70183

    <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
         https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull 
request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: 
https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the 
documentation.
   
   For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a 
short
   screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for 
a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we 
sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment 
the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [ ] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   <!--
   Generated-by: [Tool Name] following [the 
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   -->
   
   Continuation of the exception-enrichment work for spark like: [Better log 
when spark k8s driver remains in Unknown 
Phase](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70176) and [Include spark submit 
canonical logs in failure 
exceptions](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70178). Retry policies 
(LLM-based or deterministic) can only reason from what in the exception 
message, and Spark's YARN tracking
   path was the thinnest of the three deploy modes -- 
`_start_yarn_application_status_tracking`
   raised only `"ended with state: FAILED, final status: FAILED"`, with no 
indication of *why*.
   
   ## Solution
   
   YARN has a "diagnostics" field to provide detailed diag bundle for failures: 
https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/ResourceManagerRest.html
   
   Rather than assume the RM API's `diagnostics` field is populated with 
anything useful, I triggered real jobs against a live cluster and captured the 
actual RM responses.
   
   | Job tested | Diagnostics returned by RM | Message before | Message after |
   |---|---|---|---|
   | MapReduce job whose AM container fails to launch (missing 
`HADOOP_MAPRED_HOME` env) | `Application application_...0002 failed 2 times due 
to AM Container for appattempt_...000002 exited with exitCode: 1 ... Error: 
Could not find or load main class 
org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.MRAppMaster ...` | `YARN application 
application_...0002 ended with state: FAILED, final status: FAILED` | `YARN 
application application_...0002 ended with state: FAILED, final status: 
FAILED`<br>`Diagnostics: Application application_...0002 failed 2 times due to 
AM Container for appattempt_...000002 exited with exitCode: 1 ... Error: Could 
not find or load main class org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.v2.app.MRAppMaster ...` 
|
   | Long-running `pi` job killed mid-flight via `yarn application -kill` | 
`Application application_...0005 was killed by user root at 192.168.117.5` | 
`YARN application application_...0005 ended with state: KILLED, final status: 
KILLED` | `YARN application application_...0005 ended with state: KILLED, final 
status: KILLED`<br>`Diagnostics: Application application_...0005 was killed by 
user root at 192.168.117.5` |
   
   Both captured payloads were fed into `LLMRetryPolicy` across runbook 
instruction variants and all consistently classified `FAIL`, including on bare 
defaults (`none`), once the message carried the real diagnostics text. The 
killed job case also resolved an open question: "was killed by user root at 
\<ip\>" is unambiguous, distinct from how YARN phrases
   scheduler-preemption terminations -- so diagnostics alone is enough to tell 
an explicit kill from an infra-driven one.
   
   ## Proposed Change
   
   - `_query_yarn_application_status` now returns `tuple[str, str, str]` 
(`state`, `finalStatus`, `diagnostics`), reading `app.get("diagnostics", "")`.
   - Both failure raises in `_start_yarn_application_status_tracking` append 
`\nDiagnostics: {diagnostics}` when present; unchanged when absent.
   - `query_yarn_application_status` (the normalized-status public method) 
updated to unpack the 3-tuple.
   
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits 
become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
 You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you 
know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to