ahilashsasidharan opened a new pull request, #70831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70831

   … to __init__
   
    <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
         https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing!
   
   Please provide above a brief description of the changes made in this pull 
request.
   Write a good git commit message following this guide: 
https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   
   Please make sure that your code changes are covered with tests.
   And in case of new features or big changes remember to adjust the 
documentation.
   
   For user-facing UI changes, please attach before/after screenshots (or a 
short
   screen recording) so reviewers can assess the visual impact.
   
   Feel free to ping (in general) for the review if you do not see reaction for 
a few days
   (72 Hours is the minimum reaction time you can expect from volunteers) - we 
sometimes miss notifications.
   
   In case of an existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   * closes: #ISSUE
   * related: #ISSUE
   -->
   
   ## Description
   
   This PR moves template_field exclusivity check back to `__init__` from 
`execute()` while keeping the `not statement and not statement_id` sibling in 
`execute()` since it is a required-argument check (see #70503) for the 
`DatabricksSQLStatementsSensor` operators in the 
providers/databricks/src/airflow/providers/databricks/sensors/databricks.py.
   
   The check is updated to use `is not None` polarity rather than a truthiness 
check, so this is not a straight revert of the original code.
   
   These are pure provision checks ("was this argument passed?") which belong 
in `__init__` per the updated guidance in #70296, as moving them to execute() 
risks false positives when `render_template_as_native_obj=True` renders a 
provided field to None.
   
   ## Tests
   
   - Separated tests under 
providers/databricks/tests/unit/databricks/sensors/test_databricks.py added as 
part of the previous PR #70340 to validate the new behaviour.
   
   related: #70296 and #70503 
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this PR, 
please
   change below checkbox to `[X]` followed by the name of the tool, uncomment 
the "Generated-by".
   -->
   
   - [X] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   Generated-by: [Antigravity IDE] following [the 
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   
   ---
   
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits 
become permanently public when merged.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).
 You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you 
know the PR number.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to