dheerajturaga commented on PR #72407: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72407#issuecomment-5556406830
> > > I think this makes sense (the ask certainly does!) but adding a state probably needs brining up on the dev list for a short discussion (if you haven't already, I'm way behind on emails) > > > > > > I had a conversation with @eladkal at the summit where we discussed the shape. I can start a discussion thread. If this needs a larger alignment (AIP) I can do that aswell > > > > does this supress [AIP-117 Dynamic resolution of task fields](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/AIRFLOW/pages/446071748/WIP+AIP-117+Dynamic+resolution+of+task+fields)? > > > > We can start with mailing list. Depends on scope we can ask for an AIP (but I hope to avoid it) > > One discussion note should be if drain is a user facing mode or not (other than the UI). One can argue that Drain and Off are the same (drain is a "sub status" of Off) This PR is unrelated to AIP-117. I agree that drain should be viewed as a sub status of pause. Currently drain is just a transient state which will eventually be changed to pause. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
