EncrypterParv commented on issue #54829: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54829#issuecomment-6264396557
I looked into the previous attempts for this issue. PR #63471 used `http.extraHeader` and was closed as stale; PR #70204 replaced that with URL-scoped `http.<URL>.proactiveAuth=basic`, limited to HTTPS and Git 2.46+, and was also closed as stale. I’m considering working from the #70204 approach rather than resubmitting the `extraHeader` patch. Would maintainers prefer that approach, or is there a reason it should not be revived? I’ll hold off on opening another PR until I understand the intended direction. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
