github-actions[bot] opened a new pull request, #76182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/76182

   * Keep dependency upgrade explanations off the canary completion path
   
   Detailed upgrade investigations grow with the number of outdated packages 
and delay canary completion even when test preparation gets faster. Maintainers 
need prompt test results while retaining reproducible upgrade diagnostics.
   
   * Keep dependency reports from writing to the main branch cache
   
   Diagnostic reruns must retain their original inputs without gaining cache 
write access on the default branch. The workflow-run event already provides 
that boundary and the standard rerun action preserves the source canary.
   
   * Keep dependency reports aligned with supported Python versions
   
   * Keep dependency reports going when one input is gone
   
   - Skip entries whose saved constraints or CI image are missing or expired,
     with a warning and a summary line, instead of failing every report.
   - Name report inputs by canary attempt and explain each input once, so a
     re-run canary no longer queues a second report from the same inputs.
   - Post the same notice on every attempt when the canary saved no inputs.
   - Free up disk space and move Docker to /mnt before loading the image.
   - Save the checked constraints through breeze's --save-constraints-to,
     pinned to the resolved constraints commit; failing to save only warns,
     so the canary no longer depends on raw `gh api` calls.
   - Say that no cache step, not workflow_run, keeps the cache untouched, and
     skip the plan tests when node is unavailable.
   
   Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
   
   * Give dependency explanations room for the slowest constraints mode
   
   Explaining constraints-source-providers took 105-120 minutes per job in
   the last four main canaries, past the report job's 90-minute timeout.
   
   Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
   
   * Honor CONSTRAINTS_GITHUB_REPOSITORY when breeze downloads constraints
   
   CONSTRAINTS_GITHUB_REPOSITORY names the repository holding the
   constraints-* branches, apache/airflow by default, and the Dockerfiles
   read it. Breeze's download_constraints_file and get_branch_commit always
   used apache/airflow instead, so setting it changed nothing for
   constraints-version-check, the SBOM and provider dependency downloads,
   or the constraints commit saved for the dependency report.
   
   Both functions now read CONSTRAINTS_GITHUB_REPOSITORY and fall back to
   apache/airflow when it is unset or empty, so existing callers and CI on
   apache/airflow behave as before, and a saved commit always comes from
   the repository its constraints were downloaded from. Other files fetched
   through download_file_from_github still come from apache/airflow.
   
   * Explain dependencies from the image a RunsOn canary keeps in S3
   
   Since #74889 scheduled canaries run on RunsOn, where the CI image stash
   goes to RunsOn's S3 cache and only its digest is a GitHub artifact, so
   every report entry was skipped as "CI image missing". The plan now also
   accepts that digest artifact; the explain job then runs on a RunsOn
   runner, downloads exactly that tarball by its digest and checks it like
   stash-restore does. It prepares the disk with the workflow version's
   runner scripts, as the image build job now does.
   
   * Use the current RunsOn runner label for dependency reports from S3
   
   main changed breeze's RUNS_ON_AMD_RUNNER_TEMPLATE (instance families
   and spot strategy); the report's copy now matches it again, as the plan
   test that compares the two requires.
   
   * Describe re-used report inputs as saved and refuse parent segments in the 
S3 stash
   
   An earlier canary attempt only saved the inputs; its report may have failed, 
so the summary should not call them explained. The stash tarball is extracted 
with tar -P, so an entry with a .. segment could leave /mnt even under the /mnt 
prefix check.
   
   Generated-by: Claude Opus 5
   
   ---------
   (cherry picked from commit ca6861474f189f5ac26d5cecaad3300a12706375)
   
   Co-authored-by: Yossi Eliaz <[email protected]>
   Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
   Co-authored-by: Shahar Epstein <[email protected]>
   Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

  • [PR] [v3-4-test] Run dependen... github-actions[bot] (via GitHub) via commits

Reply via email to