kaxil edited a comment on pull request #8718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8718#issuecomment-624181386


   > Can you check if DAG cleaning works if it contains ExternalTaskMarker and 
recursive = True? In my opinion, this can still cause problems in some cases. 
Here is a potential path that can cause problems.
   > 
   > 1. 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/www/views.py#L1138
   >    
   >    or
   >    
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/www/views.py#L1156
   > 2. 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/www/views.py#L1138
   > 3. 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/www/views.py#L1072
   > 4. 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/models/dag.py#L956
   > 5. 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/models/dag.py#L1055
   > 6. 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/models/dag.py#L1083-L1084
   > 
   > Can you try running this DAG with serialization enabled and disabled?
   > 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/8d6f1aa4b5bb8809ffc55dc0c62e6d0e89f331e5/airflow/example_dags/example_external_task_marker_dag.py
   > If you will test on different versions of Airflow, can you also check how 
long the whole DAG Run will be done? I suspect there will be a big difference 
between Airflow 1.10.10 and older versions, but I haven't checked it yet.
   
   Isn't it a separate issue (if it is an issue) than the one mentioned in the 
PR description?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to