[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17150020#comment-17150020
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6372:
-----------------------------------------

stale[bot] commented on pull request #6931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6931#issuecomment-652838388


   This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had 
recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for 
your contributions.
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> Align Azure Blob Storage remote logging URI scheme with S3 and GCS
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-6372
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6372
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: logging
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.6
>            Reporter: Yuen-Kuei Hsueh
>            Assignee: Yuen-Kuei Hsueh
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The `remote_base_log_folder` for S3 and GCS are URI Schemes, but Azure Blob 
> Storage only contains path and [requires additional setting for container 
> name|https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/howto/write-logs.html#writing-logs-to-azure-blob-storage].
> For Hadoop ecosystem, the [URI Scheme for Azure Blob 
> Storage|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-azure/index.html#Accessing_wasb_URLs]
>  was `wasb[s]://<containername>@<accountname>.blob.core.windows.net/<path>`. 
> So I think we can use Hadoop URI Scheme for Azure Blob Storage to align the 
> configuration and make `wasb_container` parameter optional.
> The changes should be also compatible with legacy configuration.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to