mik-laj commented on pull request #7365: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7365#issuecomment-660980484
@kuromt Our mistake was to add a large number of parameters to this operator. This makes it very difficult to maintain. We are now trying to change the approach and recommend using the above-mentioned parameters. We know that changing habits can be problematic for many users and there were even command that would facilitate migrations, but it is not finished yet. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8009 Would you like to help develop this command? In my opinion, this is a better solution and more forward-looking. If we do not take steps in this direction, we will be sad all the time because we will be missing new Kubernetes features in Airfllow. We as project maintainers are also bored as we add/review every new feature the user may need. I hope that the presented description of the situation will allow us to better understand the problem that we, as a community, face. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
