ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #274:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/274#discussion_r463874597



##########
File path: 
landing-pages/site/content/en/blog/implementing-stable-API-for-Apache-Airflow.md
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+title: "Implementing Stable API for Apache Airflow"
+linkTitle: "Implementing Stable API for Apache Airflow"
+author: "Ephraim Anierobi"
+twitter: "ephraimbuddy"
+github: "ephraimbuddy"
+description: "An Outreachy intern's progress report on contributing to Apache 
Airflow REST API."
+tags: ["REST API"]
+date: "2020-07-19"
+---
+
+My [Outreachy internship](https://outreachy.org) is coming to its ends which 
is also the best time to look back and
+reflect on the progress so far.
+
+The goal of my project is to Extend and Improve the Apache Airflow REST API. 
In this post,
+I will be sharing my progress so far.
+
+We started a bit late implementing the REST API because it took time for the 
OpenAPI 3.0
+specification we were to use for the project to be merged. Thanks to 
[Kamil](https://github.com/mik-laj),
+who paved the way for us to start implementing the REST API endpoints. Below 
are the endpoints I
+implemented and the challenges I encountered, including how I overcame them.
+
+### Implementing The Read-Only Connection Endpoints
+The [read-only connection 
endpoints](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9095) were the first endpoint 
I implemented. Looking back,
+I can see how much I have improved.
+
+I started by implementing the database schema for the Connection table using 
Marshmallow 2.
+We had to use Marshmallow 2 because Flask-AppBuilder was still using it and 
Flask-AppBuilder
+is deeply integrated to Apache Airflow. This means I had to unlearn 
Marshmallow 3 that I have
+ been studying before this realization and thankfully, I started using 
Marshmallow 2 in no time.
+
+This first PR would have been more difficult than it was had it been there was 
no reference
+endpoint to look at. [Kamil](https://github.com/mik-laj) implemented a draft 
PR in which I took inspiration from.
+Thanks to this, It was easy for me to write the unit tests. It was also in 
this endpoint that
+ I learned to use parameterized in unit tests :D.
+
+### Implementing The Read-Only DagRuns Endpoints
+
+This [endpoint](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9153) came with its 
many challenges, most especially on filtering with `datetimes`.
+This was because the connexion library we were using to build the REST API was 
not validating
+date-time format in OpenAPI 3.0 specification. This I would later find out, 
was intentional.
+Connexion dropped `strict-rfc3339` because of the later licence which is not 
compatible with
+Apache 2.0 licence.
+
+I implemented a workaround on this, by defining a function called 
`conn_parse_datetime` in the
+API utils module. This was later refactored and thankfully, 
[Kamil](https://github.com/mik-laj)
+ implemented a decorator that allowed us to have cleaner code on the views 
while using this function.
+
+We later tried using `rfc3339-validator` whose licence is compatible with 
Apache 2.0 licence but
+ later discarded this because with our custom date parser we were able to use 
duration and
+ not just date times.
+
+### Other Endpoints
+I implemented some different other endpoints. One peculiar issue I faced was 
because of Marshmallow 2
+not giving error when extra fields are in the request body. I implemented a 
`validate_unknown`
+method on the schema to handle this. Thankfully, Flask-AppBuilder updated to 
using Marshmallow 3,
+we quickly updated Flask-AppBuilder in Apache Airflow and started using 
Marshmallow 3 too.
+
+Here are some PRs I contributed that are related to the REST API:

Review comment:
       I'm yet to add this. I will add it tomorrow




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to