potiuk commented on issue #10085: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10085#issuecomment-667630893
I think that's a deliberate decision for Wiki not to have comments (and it's a good one). Comments can be kept in the issues but they make it messy for "permanent pages" - you can see that in the CWiki (where a lot of stuff happens in comments and it is often not reflected in the "permanent" state of the page - or even in this one - we already have more comments than the issue description and this is hardly useful for anyone to read them in the context of "Airflow 2.0" - you do not know if everything in the comments is already reflected in the description, which part is relevant and which comments are important. So you don't bother eventually. Wiki makes it nice that you have to edit it and once you do it, your change becomes the "current status". while you can still keep the history if you want. It makes it ideal for the kind of "status" and "roadmap" pages. I'd say - let's try it and see - we can always go back it's a low-cost decision and easy to go back if we do not like it. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
