potiuk commented on pull request #9593: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9593#issuecomment-669063279
@jaketf - just the fact that Terraform operator is tricky, makes me even more convinced that we should add it :). All the words about "careful design" and how to bring the scripts etc. show that it's very far from trivial to use Terraform as a step in Airflow - but IMHO conceptually it makes perfect sense :). I can immediately start thinking about - for example - bringing the terraform scripts from Git repo by the operator.. But you are completely right - it is a big, separate discussion that seems like devlist might be the right place for :). I do not want to open another stream of discussion now, but once we get Airflow 2.0 planning under full control and scheduled, I will for sure open one :). ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
