potiuk edited a comment on pull request #10373: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10373#issuecomment-675490628
> @potiuk I don't think this needs a note in UPDATING.md because it is a regression to the previous version. Now, when we fix this bug, we will restore the original behavior of this operator. Take a look at this ticket: [#10374 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10374#issuecomment-675473990) Ah - so that's a bugfix. Then good :) Still I think such mechanism is useful - i will review all changes since the last backport packages and see if we have any of that. If we plan (we do) to split 2.0 into separate packages for release, we need to have such mechanism in place per-provider anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
