potiuk commented on issue #10180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10180#issuecomment-683397890


   Hello - just see the message now. Sorry I missed it :(
   
   The context - we had a lot of documentation which was split into several 
different sources - Github docs, Cwiki, Airflow documentation in docs.  Airflow 
Site and sometimes the documentation was overlapping, sometimes outdated, 
sometimes it did not contain relevant information. 
   
   We are now cleaning and restructuring the docs to be more consistent. It's 
mostly based on who the "Readers" of the documentation are:
   
   * Airflow Docs - those are mostly the users of Airflow. People who either 
want to setup and manage Airlfow or those who want to write Dags or develop 
custom operators/Hooks etc. .
   
   * Github Docs - Contributors and Committers. Basically, developers of Airflow
   
   * Airlfow Site - mostly decision makers, those who would like to understand 
whether Airflow is a good choice for them. Also people who want to learn 
Airflow and decide whether they shoudl become users or contributors or both. 
Basically this should be index of "Everything Airflow" and a starting point for 
everything else.
   
   * CWiki - we keep it mostly for AIPs (Airflow Improvement Proposals). But 
it's very likely (discussion 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf58348edc3ed4ad8dd167cdbeda0a2a5219a2ab1725d4e1b7e980d9a%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E)
 we will get rid of it completely and move all the new AIPs to Github Issues. 
   
   The common pitfalls doc clearly belongs to the "Airlfow Docs" (readership = 
users of Airflow). I think there should be a page in the Airflow Documentation 
with Common Pftfalls. And I believe it is enough to make a PR as  starting 
point with the content of the original document in CWiki and you will get 
plenty of comments from the community and suggestions what else to add ...


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to