[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15317128#comment-15317128
]
Dan Davydov commented on AIRFLOW-184:
-------------------------------------
I agree that mark_success should be moved into a separate command. I don't
think the command even needs to interact with workers at all like the current
way backfill + mark_success works, and we could also simplify a lot of the
code. I think it is ok to break backwards incompatibility here without bumping
to a major release risk-wise but I think 1-2 other committers should +1 this
since it's a bit of a grey area. Otherwise we can add the new --mark-success
command, deprecate backfill --mark-success and break compatibility in 2.0.
> Add clear/mark success to CLI
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-184
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-184
> Project: Apache Airflow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cli
> Reporter: Chris Riccomini
> Assignee: Joy Gao
>
> AIRFLOW-177 pointed out that the current CLI does not allow us to clear or
> mark success a task (including upstream, downstream, past, future, and
> recursive) the way that the UI widget does. Given a goal of keeping parity
> between the UI and CLI, it seems like we should support this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
