[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15693512#comment-15693512
 ] 

Luke Maycock edited comment on AIRFLOW-642 at 11/24/16 3:30 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

+1 

We also find this to be an issue. This issue is similar to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-70 but the use of a numeric 
unique identifier is preferable to a string such as dag_run_id. 

Also, it makes sense to address the relationship between xcoms and dag runs 
using similar logic.  We believe this would have to happen as part of this work 
otherwise xcoms will not continue to work. 


was (Author: lukem):
+1 

We also find this to be an issue. This issue is similar to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-70 but the use of a numeric 
unique identifier is preferable to a string such as dag_run_id. 

Also, it makes sense to address the relationship between xcoms and dag runs 
using similar logic. 

>  Add dag_run to the task_instance table or create new taskuuid column and use 
> this to uniquely identify a task
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-642
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DagRun, scheduler
>            Reporter: Arunprasad
>
> We are planning to run around 40,000 tasks a day using airflow and some of 
> them are critical to give quick feedback to developers. 
> Currently having execution date to uniquely identify tasks does not work for 
> us since we mainly trigger dags (instead of running them on schedule) we 
> collide with 1 sec granularity on several occasions.  Having a task uuid or 
> associating dag_run to task_instance  table and using this for scheduling and 
> updating status will help us here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to