Yi Chen created AIRFLOW-870:
-------------------------------

             Summary: Airflow Web UI "Mark Success" action not working properly
                 Key: AIRFLOW-870
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-870
             Project: Apache Airflow
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: Airflow 1.8
            Reporter: Yi Chen


I have found a few issues and some ideas of resolving them:
1) Issue: In Web UI, if click Mark Success of a task that has not been 
processed(a.k.a any white box in list view), I get "No task instances to mark 
as successful" error message.
Reason: A task that has not been processed has a record in the table 
task_instance with state column value as NULL. Then, here 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/v1-8-stable/airflow/www/views.py#L1146
 , this line filters out not only the case `TI.state = State.SUCCESS` but also 
the case `TI.state is NULL`. 
Solution: make this line as ` or_((TI.state.is_(None)), TI.state != 
State.SUCCESS)).all()` 

2) Issue: Not clear why we need a new option in "Mark Success" -- the 
"Recursive" option. I think we used to have the option "DownStream" or 
"UpStream" with recursive searching. Can anyone explain the design and double 
check the implementation. Right now, if I do not choose "Recursive" option with 
the "DownStream". I get KeyError in this line 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/v1-8-stable/airflow/www/views.py#L1188.
 
Reason: In this line, 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/v1-8-stable/airflow/www/views.py#L1122
 , We actually have got the relatives from recursive searching already, and the 
task_ids are populated, but task_id_to_dag are not populated properly if  
"Recursive" option is not chosen. Therefore a KeyError show up later as 
mentioned above.
Solution: I think we have to discuss the design of the desired behavior of each 
option and refactor code w.r.t.the design.

[This is my first Apache JIRA ticket. Feel free to point out any mistakes in 
reporting and describing issues if I have any.]




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to