Berislav Lopac created AIRFLOW-2326:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Duplicate GCS copy operator
Key: AIRFLOW-2326
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2326
Project: Apache Airflow
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Berislav Lopac
I apologise if this is a known thing, but I have been wondering if anyone can
give a rationale why do we have two separate operators that perform Google
Cloud Storage objects copy -- specifically,
{{gcs_copy_operator.GoogleCloudStorageCopyOperator}} and
{{gcs_to_gcs.GoogleCloudStorageToGoogleCloudStorageOperator}}. As far as I can
tell they have nearly the same functionality, with the latter being a bit more
flexible (with the {{move_object}} flag).
If both are not needed, I would like to propose removing one of them
(specifically, the {{gcs_copy_operator}} one); if necessary it can be made into
a wrapper/subclass of the other one, marked for deprecation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
