[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16512057#comment-16512057
 ] 

Kevin Yang commented on AIRFLOW-2615:
-------------------------------------

[~joygao] Not very confident in the webserver area, would you kindly provide 
you opinion here please? Thank you!

> Webserver not using cached app
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-2615
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2615
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kevin Yang
>            Priority: Major
>
> From what I can tell, the app cached here attempt to cache the app for later 
> use-likely to be for the expensive DagBag() creation. Before I dive into the 
> webserver parsing everything in one process problem, I was hoping this cached 
> app would save me sometime. However it seems to me that every subprocess spun 
> up by gunicorn is trying to create the DagBag() right after they've been 
> created--make sense to me since we didn't share the cached app to the 
> subprocess( doubt we can). If what I observed is true, why do we cache the 
> app at all?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to