[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16538978#comment-16538978
 ] 

Eamon Keane commented on AIRFLOW-2745:
--------------------------------------

Hope I've got the above correct!

> Use k8s service account for Kube Pod Operator if in Cluster and using 
> LocalExecutor
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-2745
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2745
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: operators
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Eamon Keane
>            Assignee: Daniel Imberman
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: features
>
> When deploying airflow on kubernetes and using LocalExecutor, currently the 
> Kubernetes Pod Operator relies on a kubeconfig file being mounted on the 
> scheduler and has no awareness of being inside a cluster.
> There is no option to mount a kubeconfig file on a KubernetesExecutor worker 
> as the KubernetesExecutor instead launches Kubenetes Pod Operator pods using 
> the mounted RBAC account.
> For users switching between the KubernetesExecutor and LocalExecutor in a 
> helm chart (for example by using --set core.executor=LocalExecutor), an 
> additional kubeconfig secret has to be managed and mounted on scheduler if 
> they want to debug a dag which uses the Kubernetes Pod Operator, while it 
> could instead use the RBAC account.
> An example where switching between local and kubernetes executor was useful 
> was to discover that the reason a dag worked on Local but not on Kubernetes 
> Executor was because the fernet key was not specified as an environment 
> variable in the worker definition.
> The suggested improvement would be to use the mounted RBAC account on the 
> scheduler pod to launch pods if in a kubernetes environment, removing the 
> need for a kubeconfig.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to