ubermen opened a new pull request #3874: [AIRFLOW-3001] Add task_instance table 
index 'ti_dag_date'
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/3874
 
 
   [ Description ]
   There was no index composed of dag_id and execution_date. So, when scheduler 
find all tis of dagrun like this "select * from task_instance where dag_id = 
'some_id' and execution_date = '2018-09-01 ...'", this query will be using 
ti_dag_state index (I was testing it in mysql workbench. I was expecting 
'ti_state_lkp' but, it was not that case). Perhaps there's no problem when 
range of execution_date is small (under 1000 dagrun), but I had experienced 
slow allocation of tis when the dag had 1000+ accumulative dagrun. So, now I 
was using airflow with adding new index ti_dag_date (dag_id, execution_date) on 
task_instance table. I have attached result of my test :)
   
   [ Test ]
   models.py > DAG.run
   jobs.py > BaseJob.run
   jobs.py > BackfillJob._execute
   jobs.py > BackfillJob._execute_for_run_dates
   jobs.py > BackfillJob._task_instances_for_dag_run
   models.py > DagRun.get_task_instances
   tis = session.query(TI).filter(
   TI.dag_id == self.dag_id,
   TI.execution_date == self.execution_date,
   )
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6738941/45285016-fb9ecc00-b51c-11e8-945c-c28d81aece02.png)
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6738941/45285019-fe012600-b51c-11e8-91fa-a66c2293ca5d.png)
   
   
   ### Jira
   
   - [ ] My PR addresses the following [Airflow 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW/) issues and references 
them in the PR title. For example, "\[AIRFLOW-XXX\] My Airflow PR"
     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-XXX
     - In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your 
commit with \[AIRFLOW-XXX\], code changes always need a Jira issue.
   
   ### Description
   
   - [ ] Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI 
changes:
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [ ] My PR adds the following unit tests __OR__ does not need testing for 
this extremely good reason:
   
   ### Commits
   
   - [ ] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I 
have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my 
commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit 
message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
     1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
     1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
     1. Subject does not end with a period
     1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
     1. Body wraps at 72 characters
     1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [ ] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes 
how to use it.
     - When adding new operators/hooks/sensors, the autoclass documentation 
generation needs to be added.
   
   ### Code Quality
   
   - [ ] Passes `git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff`
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to