[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16618958#comment-16618958
]
Kaxil Naik edited comment on AIRFLOW-26 at 9/18/18 11:23 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, we are also proposing to move the contrib hooks/and operators in a
separate repository. So not sure what is the best naming convention. [~fenglu]
Any thoughts? But yes the `gcp_service` seems logical to me.
was (Author: kaxilnaik):
Currently, we are also proposing to move the contrib hooks/and operators in a
separate repository. So not sure what is the best naming convention. [~fenglu]
Any thoughts?
> GCP hook naming alignment
> -------------------------
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-26
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-26
> Project: Apache Airflow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: gcp
> Reporter: Alex Van Boxel
> Assignee: Alex Van Boxel
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: gcp
>
> Because we have quite a few GCP services, it's better to align the naming to
> not confuse new users using Google Cloud Platform:
> gcp_storage > renamed from gcs
> gcp_bigquery > renamed from bigquery
> gcp_datastore > rename from datastore
> gcp_dataflow > TBD
> gcp_dataproc > TBD
> gcp_bigtable > TBD
> Note: this could break 'custom' operators if they use the hooks.
> Can be assigned to me.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
