XD-DENG commented on a change in pull request #4071: [AIRFLOW-3237] Refactor 
example DAGs
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/4071#discussion_r227621054
 
 

 ##########
 File path: airflow/example_dags/example_xcom.py
 ##########
 @@ -63,12 +61,21 @@ def puller(**kwargs):
 
 
 push1 = PythonOperator(
-    task_id='push', dag=dag, python_callable=push)
+    task_id='push',
+    dag=dag,
+    python_callable=push,
+)
 
 push2 = PythonOperator(
-    task_id='push_by_returning', dag=dag, python_callable=push_by_returning)
+    task_id='push_by_returning',
+    dag=dag,
+    python_callable=push_by_returning,
+)
 
 pull = PythonOperator(
-    task_id='puller', dag=dag, python_callable=puller)
+    task_id='puller',
+    dag=dag,
+    python_callable=puller,
+)
 
-pull.set_upstream([push1, push2])
+pull << [push1, push2]
 
 Review comment:
   Hi @Fokko @BasPH,
   
   Ok, I'm quite surprised that these operators are already there since 1.8 
while I have never seen it in the main tutorials/documentation.
   
   I  think the main point to consider here is the `"education"`. Users like 
myself and @kaxil even didn't know the existence of these operators.
   
   If we are going to do this, I would suggest to involve documentation 
"refactoring" as well. Make sure `>>` and `<<` operators are mentioned properly 
in the documentation/tutorials, so no users would be confused.
   
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to