kaxil commented on a change in pull request #4071: [AIRFLOW-3237] Refactor 
example DAGs
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/4071#discussion_r227667674
 
 

 ##########
 File path: airflow/example_dags/example_xcom.py
 ##########
 @@ -63,12 +61,21 @@ def puller(**kwargs):
 
 
 push1 = PythonOperator(
-    task_id='push', dag=dag, python_callable=push)
+    task_id='push',
+    dag=dag,
+    python_callable=push,
+)
 
 push2 = PythonOperator(
-    task_id='push_by_returning', dag=dag, python_callable=push_by_returning)
+    task_id='push_by_returning',
+    dag=dag,
+    python_callable=push_by_returning,
+)
 
 pull = PythonOperator(
-    task_id='puller', dag=dag, python_callable=puller)
+    task_id='puller',
+    dag=dag,
+    python_callable=puller,
+)
 
-pull.set_upstream([push1, push2])
+pull << [push1, push2]
 
 Review comment:
   @XD-DENG Well, I was unsure of the task list usage with rshift and lshift 
operators😂 not `>>` or `<<` (rshift or lshift) itself...
   
   I think we already had good documentation over using them and I prefer using 
those as it resembles DAG + it is more clean. Many of our examples already do 
that.
   
   But yes after @BasPH pointed o the implementation we can surely do that and 
should be documented.
   
   @BasPH can you please add the docs. One liner with one or two examples is 
fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to