lintingbin opened a new issue, #3395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/3395
### What happened?
If the clean-orphan-file.enabled parameter is set to false before the Amoro
process successfully commits, it will cause the process to remain stuck in the
committing state and unable to complete.
### Affects Versions
0.7.1
### What table formats are you seeing the problem on?
Iceberg
### What engines are you seeing the problem on?
AMS
### How to reproduce
_No response_
### Relevant log output
```shell
"async-table-runtime-refresh-executor-1" #68 prio=5 os_prio=0
tid=0x00007d750de2b000 nid=0x91 waiting on condition [0x00007d688acfe000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00007d6a51002b70> (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:836)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireQueued(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:870)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquire(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1199)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync.lock(ReentrantLock.java:209)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.lock(ReentrantLock.java:285)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.optimizing.OptimizingQueue$TableOptimizingProcess.close(OptimizingQueue.java:426)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.TableRuntime.updateConfigInternal(TableRuntime.java:358)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.TableRuntime.lambda$refresh$9(TableRuntime.java:241)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.TableRuntime$$Lambda$789/1085405103.get(Unknown
Source)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.persistence.StatedPersistentBase.invokeConsistency(StatedPersistentBase.java:64)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.TableRuntime.refresh(TableRuntime.java:238)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.TableRuntimeRefreshExecutor.execute(TableRuntimeRefreshExecutor.java:86)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.BaseTableExecutor.executeTask(BaseTableExecutor.java:84)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.BaseTableExecutor.lambda$scheduleIfNecessary$4(BaseTableExecutor.java:95)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.BaseTableExecutor$$Lambda$668/265438551.run(Unknown
Source)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- <0x00007d69deae2070> (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)
- <0x00007d6a1f792648> (a
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker)
"async-optimizing-commit-executor-48" #80263 prio=5 os_prio=0
tid=0x00007d680004e000 nid=0x139d7 waiting on condition [0x00007d6783ffe000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00007d69deae2070> (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:836)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireQueued(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:870)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquire(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1199)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync.lock(ReentrantLock.java:209)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.lock(ReentrantLock.java:285)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.persistence.StatedPersistentBase.invokeConsistency(StatedPersistentBase.java:48)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.TableRuntime.completeProcess(TableRuntime.java:288)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.optimizing.OptimizingQueue$TableOptimizingProcess.lambda$persistProcessCompleted$12(OptimizingQueue.java:664)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.optimizing.OptimizingQueue$TableOptimizingProcess$$Lambda$647/576698622.run(Unknown
Source)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.persistence.PersistentBase$$Lambda$648/735764202.accept(Unknown
Source)
at
java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:948)
at
java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$Head.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:647)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.persistence.PersistentBase.doAsTransaction(PersistentBase.java:77)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.optimizing.OptimizingQueue.access$400(OptimizingQueue.java:73)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.optimizing.OptimizingQueue$TableOptimizingProcess.persistProcessCompleted(OptimizingQueue.java:652)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.optimizing.OptimizingQueue$TableOptimizingProcess.commit(OptimizingQueue.java:575)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.OptimizingCommitExecutor.execute(OptimizingCommitExecutor.java:53)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.BaseTableExecutor.executeTask(BaseTableExecutor.java:84)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.BaseTableExecutor.lambda$scheduleIfNecessary$4(BaseTableExecutor.java:95)
at
org.apache.amoro.server.table.executor.BaseTableExecutor$$Lambda$668/265438551.run(Unknown
Source)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- <0x00007d69e3000aa0> (a
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker)
- <0x00007d6a51002b70> (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)
Found one Java-level deadlock:
=============================
"JettyServerThreadPool-37129725":
waiting for ownable synchronizer 0x00007d6a51002b70, (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync),
which is held by "async-optimizing-commit-executor-48"
"async-optimizing-commit-executor-48":
waiting for ownable synchronizer 0x00007d69deae2070, (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync),
which is held by "async-table-runtime-refresh-executor-1"
"async-table-runtime-refresh-executor-1":
waiting for ownable synchronizer 0x00007d6a51002b70, (a
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync),
which is held by "async-optimizing-commit-executor-48"
```
### Anything else
_No response_
### Are you willing to submit a PR?
- [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
### Code of Conduct
- [X] I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
