xxubai opened a new issue, #3790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/3790

   ### Search before asking
   
   - [x] I have searched in the 
[issues](https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and found no 
similar issues.
   
   
   ### What would you like to be improved?
   
   If an Iceberg table had snapshots committed by a Flink job in its early 
stages, but subsequent commits are no longer made by Flink, this can result in 
a large number of snapshots and data files being retained.
   
   ### How should we improve?
   
   Iceberg maintainers need to expire Flink commit snapshots when necessary.
   
   1. The timestamp of the latest Flink commit snapshot should be earlier than 
(now - TTL) * 2.
   2. No additional Flink commit snapshots exist within the TTL duration.
   
   Do you have any solutions? @zhoujinsong @klion26 @czy006 @baiyangtx @Aireed 
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [x] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Subtasks
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [x] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to