This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
fenbox pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/answer-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new b4470ab11 update: typo
b4470ab11 is described below
commit b4470ab1126150180f98ebe242969b9926dd9b94
Author: fen <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu Nov 13 09:51:54 2025 +0800
update: typo
---
blog/best-stackoverflow-internal-alternatives/index.md | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/blog/best-stackoverflow-internal-alternatives/index.md
b/blog/best-stackoverflow-internal-alternatives/index.md
index d0f2de97b..b136add16 100644
--- a/blog/best-stackoverflow-internal-alternatives/index.md
+++ b/blog/best-stackoverflow-internal-alternatives/index.md
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ authors: [fenbox]
category: Insights
# featured: true
image: [email protected]
-description: "Discover the best Stack Overflow Internal (Original name: Stack
Overflow Internal) alternatives in 2025. Learn how Apache Answer — and its
hosted SaaS edition AnswerGrowth — provide a powerful, open-source approach to
team Q&A and knowledge sharing."
+description: "Discover the best Stack Overflow Internal (Original name Stack
Overflow for Teams) alternatives in 2025. Learn how Apache Answer — and its
hosted SaaS edition AnswerGrowth — provide a powerful, open-source approach to
team Q&A and knowledge sharing."
---
### Why Teams Are Looking for Alternatives to Stack Overflow Internal
-Stack Overflow Internal (Original name: Stack Overflow Internal) has long been
a go-to solution for developer collaboration and internal Q&A. However, as
teams expand across departments, many are finding it **expensive**, **rigid**,
and **less adaptable** to broader organizational needs.
+Stack Overflow Internal (Original name Stack Overflow for Teams) has long been
a go-to solution for developer collaboration and internal Q&A. However, as
teams expand across departments, many are finding it **expensive**, **rigid**,
and **less adaptable** to broader organizational needs.
Common challenges include:
