Author: buildbot
Date: Wed Feb  9 14:53:15 2011
New Revision: 785076

Log:
Staging update by buildbot

Modified:
    
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html

Modified: 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html
==============================================================================
--- 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html
 (original)
+++ 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html
 Wed Feb  9 14:53:15 2011
@@ -257,11 +257,13 @@ current process did not use semantic ver
 
 <p><img alt="rel" src="release_by_module.png" /></p>
 <p>In this case, we have a module version (independent of the version of its 
sub-modules) and a set of sub-modules which may each be indepndently versioned.
+
 ## Advantages of release by module
- 1. Releaseing a coherent set of bundles that have been built and run together
- 1. Releaseing a buildable set of source for all constituent bundles in one 
zip file
+ 1. Releasing a coherent set of bundles that have been built and run together
+ 1. Releasing a buildable set of source for all constituent bundles in one zip 
file
  1. A more consumable unit than a set of single bundles - easier for Aries 
consumers. A smaller number of discrete downloads.
-## Disadvantages of teh release by module process
+
+## Disadvantages of the release by module process
  1. We would want to release a whole module at once, this would mean 
re-releasing bundles at the same level 
  (and with the same content) as a previous release. This is not a major issue
  1. Developer would need to be careful to version submodules poms 
independently from the parent/reactor pom. Again, 
@@ -271,15 +273,13 @@ Therefore we would either require change
 and maintain our own alternative, to allow us to release by module.
  1. It's not all clear what the strategy for branching would be. For example, 
consider the following scenario: 
 ![rel](branches_and_modules.png)
-<p>
-
-The bundles in trunk should be versioned differently from the versions in 
branch. This really mandates a bump in the major version.
-The consequence of not bumping the major version and using the versioning tool 
to compare versions in trunk (for the next release from trunk)
-and using the versioning tool to create bug fix versios from the branch has 
the potential to lead to the situation in which bundles with the
+<p>The bundles in trunk should be versioned differently from the versions in 
branch. This really mandates a bump in the major version.
+<p>The consequence of not bumping the major version and using the versioning 
tool to compare versions in trunk (for the next release from trunk)
+and using the versioning tool to create bug fix versions from the branch has 
the potential to lead to the situation in which bundles with the
 same version number have different content.
-For example, as time goes on you create another release (version 6) of the 
proxy module, the version compare tool tells you that proxy-impl 
-should be released at version 0.4.2, so that is released in a module release 
at version 6. But now, somone who wants a fix to proxy-impl in 0.4.1 which we 
would want to do 
-from the branch, would also get a proxy-impl bundle at version 0.4.2 with 
different content.</div>
+For example, as time goes on another release (version 6) of the proxy module 
is created, the version compare tool dictates that proxy-impl 
+should be released at version 0.4.2. But now, someone who wants a fix to 
proxy-impl in 0.4.1 (in proxy module version 5) which would be provided
+from the branch, would also get a proxy-impl bundle at version 0.4.2 with 
different content. This is a situation which must be avoided.</div>
             <!-- Content -->
           </td>
         </tr>


Reply via email to