Author: buildbot
Date: Wed Feb  9 16:03:37 2011
New Revision: 785088

Log:
Staging update by buildbot

Modified:
    
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html

Modified: 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html
==============================================================================
--- 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html
 (original)
+++ 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html
 Wed Feb  9 16:03:37 2011
@@ -294,19 +294,13 @@ and it works with blueprint-core 1.1.0. 
 <h3 id="disadvantages_of_releasing_by_bundle">Disadvantages of releasing by 
bundle</h3>
 <ol>
 <li>It is more difficult for a consumer of Aries modules to understand which 
bundles form a logical grouping</li>
-<li>
-<p>There are a lot of bundles to manage independently. This has 
implications:</p>
-</li>
-<li>
-<p>Releasing - mvn release:prepare an so on,  needs to be run for each bundle 
separately. However, many bundles could be rolled up into one vote.</p>
-</li>
+<li>There are a lot of bundles to manage independently. This has 
implications:<ul>
+<li>Releasing - mvn release:prepare an so on,  needs to be run for each bundle 
separately. However, many bundles could be rolled up into one vote.</li>
 <li>Each bundle has to have its own JIRA component</li>
-<li>
-<p>Our svn tree would need to be restructured - probably in a similar way to 
the Sling tree. Each bundle would have its own trunk &amp; branches.</p>
-</li>
-<li>
-<p>There are still some issues with branching and it is still possible to get 
into a situation similar to that described above. </p>
+<li>Our svn tree would need to be restructured - probably in a similar way to 
the Sling tree. Each bundle would have its own trunk &amp; branches.</li>
+</ul>
 </li>
+<li>There are still some issues with branching and it is still possible to get 
into a situation similar to that described above. </li>
 </ol></div>
             <!-- Content -->
           </td>


Reply via email to