[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15942302#comment-15942302
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-1573:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user peay opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2330

    [BEAM-1573] Use Kafka serializers instead of coders in KafkaIO

    Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
    quickly and easily:
    
     - [x] Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
       `[BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request`
     - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `mvn clean verify`. (Even better, enable
           Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
     - [x] Replace `<Jira issue #>` in the title with the actual Jira issue
           number, if there is one.
     - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
           [Individual Contributor License 
Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt).
    
    ---
    
    
    
    **This is a work in progress, do not merge**.
    
    Modified:
    - Use Kafka serializers and deserializers in KafkaIO
    - Added helper methods `fromAvro` and `toAvro`, to use serialization based 
on `AvroCoder`. This is uniform with other IO such as HDFS.
    - Moved `CoderBasedKafkaSerializer` out, and added 
`CoderBaseKafkaDeserializer`. These are used for `toAvro/fromAvro`, and can be 
useful to port existing code that relies on coder.
    - Added `InstantSerializer` and `InstantDeserializer`, as `Instant` is used 
in some of the tests.
     
    Writer lets Kafka handle serialization itself. Reader uses Kafka byte 
deserializers, and calls the user-provided Kafka deserializer from `advance`. 
Note that Kafka serializers and deserializers are not themselves 
`Serializable`. Hence, I've used a `Class<..>` in the `spec` both for read and 
write.
    
    There is still an issue, though. `Read` still takes **both a deserializer 
and a coder**. This is because the source must implement 
`getDefaultOutputCoder`, and I am not sure how to infer it. Having to provide 
the two is heavy, but I am not sure how to infer the coders in this context. 
Any thoughts?
    
    cc @rangadi @jkff


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/peay/beam BEAM-1573

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2330.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2330
    
----
commit 511a1301190b08b05573e3025d7ade2746d61e5f
Author: peay <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-03-26T14:51:59Z

    [BEAM-1573] Use Kafka serializers instead of coders in KafkaIO

----


> KafkaIO does not allow using Kafka serializers and deserializers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-1573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1573
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-java-extensions
>    Affects Versions: 0.4.0, 0.5.0
>            Reporter: peay
>            Assignee: Raghu Angadi
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Not applicable
>
>
> KafkaIO does not allow to override the serializer and deserializer settings 
> of the Kafka consumer and producers it uses internally. Instead, it allows to 
> set a `Coder`, and has a simple Kafka serializer/deserializer wrapper class 
> that calls the coder.
> I appreciate that allowing to use Beam coders is good and consistent with the 
> rest of the system. However, is there a reason to completely disallow to use 
> custom Kafka serializers instead?
> This is a limitation when working with an Avro schema registry for instance, 
> which requires custom serializers. One can write a `Coder` that wraps a 
> custom Kafka serializer, but that means two levels of un-necessary wrapping.
> In addition, the `Coder` abstraction is not equivalent to Kafka's 
> `Serializer` which gets the topic name as input. Using a `Coder` wrapper 
> would require duplicating the output topic setting in the argument to 
> `KafkaIO` and when building the wrapper, which is not elegant and error prone.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to