[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15969369#comment-15969369
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-1978:
--------------------------------------
GitHub user rangadi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2541
[BEAM-1978] Avoid repackaging bigtable classes in dataflow runner.
Dataflow bundled jar does not need to repackage bigtable classes. This
repackaging was probably never required in Apache Beam.
This didn't affect before BEAM-1722 (PR #2503) since it was not was part of
a test dependency. Now it is a compile time dependency.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rangadi/incubator-beam fix_repackage
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2541.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #2541
----
commit 84b76911af2d49ccdb9f25182e7c3e3d0becc15d
Author: Raghu Angadi <[email protected]>
Date: 2017-04-14T18:18:05Z
Avoi repackaging bigtable classes in dataflow runner.
----
> Avoid repackaging bigtable classes in Dataflow runner jar
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-1978
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1978
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: runner-dataflow
> Reporter: Raghu Angadi
> Assignee: Raghu Angadi
>
> Dataflow bundled jar does not need to repackage bigtable classes. This
> repackaging was probably never required in Apache Beam.
> This didn't affect before BEAM-1722 (PR 2503) since it was not was part of a
> test dependency. Now it is a compile time dependency.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
