[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15991716#comment-15991716
 ] 

Kenneth Knowles edited comment on BEAM-1327 at 5/1/17 11:09 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Noting also that the enum is part of the runner API. At a GBK the 
{{TimestampCombiner}} must always be applied to the timestamp after the 
{{WindowFn}} has transformed it. This is implemented for all runners and the 
Java SDK includes plenty of {{ValidatesRunner}} coverage.


was (Author: kenn):
Noting also that the enum is part of the runner API. At a GBK the 
{{TimestampCombiner}} must always be applied to the timestamp after the 
{{WindowFn}} has transformed it. This is implemented for all runners.

> Replace OutputTimeFn with enum
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-1327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1327
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Assignee: Kenneth Knowles
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: backward-incompatible
>             Fix For: First stable release
>
>
> The class {{OutputTimeFn}} is overkill for a Fn API crossing. There are only 
> three sensible values known: MIN, MAX, EOW. The interface is right for 
> implementing these, but the full class is left over from the days when there 
> was little cost to shipping new kinds of fns. An enum is concise.
> This can be done "mostly" backwards compatibly with legacy adapters in place, 
> but might be less confusing without them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to